A little over three months ago,
I wrote about a potential Big Ten expansion, and who some possible candidates would be to jump ship from their conferences and join up with the Big Televen.
Let's play a gigantic game of 'What If?,' sponsored by the
Star-Ledger, who put together
a fantastic graphic of what it would look like if the Big Ten, SEC, Big 12, Pac-10, ACC and Atlantic 10 poached every relevant team and completely reorganized to form six super conferences (sorry, Conference USA and Mountain West Conferences!).
Though it will almost certainly never happen, there's nothing better than a little premature speculation. Let's check it out. And don't worry, Terps fans, Athletic Director
Debbie Yow said there's
no truth to Maryland moving to the Big Ten, at least not any time soon.
ATLANTIC 10
Current members to remain: Charlotte, Dayton, Duquesne, Fordham, George Washington, La Salle, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Richmond, St. Bonaventure, St. Joseph's, Xavier
Would-be additions: DePaul, Marquette, Providence, Seton Hall
Would-be subtractions: St. Louis, Temple
Bottom line: The A-10 would get a lot stronger with the additions of the Big East's bottom feeders. Since none of the four schools who would be hypothetically joining the conference have major football teams and all four are not competing year-in-and-year-out for a Big East championship, these four would make sense to add to the Atlantic 10.
All four would might begrudgingly join, as the drop off from Big East to Atlantic 10 is definitely a demotion, but all four teams would be able to win quickly in the conference, and hit the ground running, particularly Providence and Marquette.
Geographically, this would mean that the A-10 would stretch as far east as Amherst, Massachusetts (Massachusetts) and as far west as Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Marquette). That would actually be tighter than the A-10's current span, which goes beyond Milwaukee all the way to St. Louis, Missouri (Saint Louis). Humorously, the conference would still imply 10 members, despite swelling all the way to 18 with this expansion.
Verdict: All in all, a definite upgrade for the Atlantic 10.
BIG ATLANTIC (FORMERLY ACC AND BIG EAST)Current members to remain: Boston College, Duke, Maryland, NC State, North Carolina, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Wake Forest
Would-be additions: Cincinnati, Connecticut, Georgetown, Louisville, Memphis, Notre Dame, South Florida, St. John's, Temple, UCF, Villanova, West Virginia
Would-be subtractions: Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech,

Miami (FL)
Bottom line:
This potential realignment blows my mind. The ACC would be adding nine Big East basketball teams, and would have four basketball-only teams -- a deal that grosses me out with the current Big East structure. Essentially, these two conferences would join at the hip.
But trading Florida State and Miami for UCF and South Florida, Georgia Tech for Memphis and losing Clemson doesn't sound like fun.
Geographically, this move would push the conference's boundaries as far north as Boston, Massachusetts (Boston College), as far west as Memphis, Tennessee (Memphis) and as far south as Tampa, Florida (South Florida). It would put 20 schools across 13 states, thanks to Memphis, Notre Dame, Cincinnati and the Florida schools.
Verdict: Losing the biggest four schools in the southern part of the conference is tough, especially because adding teams like Memphis, Temple and UCF don't negate any part of the losses on the football side.
Becoming the Big East version 2.0 is not appealing, unless the 'Big Atlantic' is willing to part ways with any football tradition whatsoever. Anyone who enjoys Saturdays in the fall would not be happy to see this change. From a basketball view, the ACC/Big East duo -- er, Big Atlantic -- would be the hands-down powerhouse, which would excite UNC, Duke and Maryland fans. All in all, a losing proposition if you're a football fan, and a winning proposition if you're a basketball fan and/or don't pay attention to college football.
BIG TEN
Current members to remain: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Northwestern, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Wisconsin
Would-be additions: Nebraska, Rutgers, Syracuse, Missouri, Pittsburgh
Would-be subtractions: None
Bottom line: Pittsburgh has long been a name thrown around in the discussion for Big Ten expansion, and it would appear that the Big Ten would be willing to take Rutgers, a team without a ton of tradition, in order to lock up Syracuse and Pitt.
Imagine a scenario in which Syracuse's men's soccer team had to travel to Nebraska for a league game. That's 1,200 miles, or a 19-hour bus ride. This doesn't seem particularly feasible from a travel standpoint, but this move would strengthen the Big Ten's already strong football reputation. Losing nobody doesn't hurt, either.
Geographically, this expansion would leave Big Ten with 16 teams across 12 states, by far the biggest stretch of mileage for any conference in this proposed move. The Big Ten would stretch as far east as Piscataway, New Jersey (Rutgers) and as far north as Minneapolis, Minnesota (Minnesota), as far west as Lincoln, Nebraska (Nebraska) and as far south as Columbia, Missouri (Missouri).
Verdict: The Big Ten has been spear-heading the expansion talks, so it makes sense that it would be licking its chops for the opportunity to add Syracuse, Nebraska, Mizzou and Pitt. Rutgers wouldn't add much from a basketball, football or even media perspective, but it could be a necessary part of the deal. All in all, this would be a step up for the Big Ten, especially because adding Syracuse and Pitt would bolster the conference's basketball power.
BIG 12
Current members to remain: Baylor, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech
Would-be additions: BYU, Colorado State, Houston, New Mexico, TCU, Tulsa, Utah
Would-be subtractions: Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska
Bottom line: Regardless of an expansion or no expansion, the Big 12

should consider dropping Iowa State altogether. The Cyclones don't bring much to the table in basketball or football, and are the geographic outlier in the equation. Adding teams from the Mountain West (BYU, Colorado State, New Mexico, TCU, Utah) makes sense, as the Big 12 would be essentially cherry-picking who could compete reasonably well in both sports. The additions of Conference USA talents Houston and Tulsa would also be a good two-sport move.
The real head-scratcher is in figuring out why Colorado State isn't
already in the Big 12, with Colorado in and Iowa State in. Not that the Rams are particularly competitive, either, but it's a strange move that leaves Colorado State as a big fish in a medium-sized pond.
These proposed additions would expand the Big 12 as far north as Ames, Iowa (Iowa State), as far west as Salt Lake City, Utah (Utah), and as far south as Houston, Texas (Houston), which is 16 schools in eight states, nine of which are located in either Texas or Oklahoma.
Losing Colorado, Missouri and Nebraska makes this far from a slam dunk for the Big 12. Mizzou and Nebraska bring something to the table in football, and the Tigers are a good two-sport member. Nebraska has had down years but boasts a ton of tradition, while Colorado hasn't been relevant in either sport for a while now.
Verdict: The Big 12 wouldn't get significantly stronger in basketball rather than football, or vice versa, but it would provide the conference with a lot of competitive depth. This would be a fairly neutral, possibly negative move for the Big 12, especially if it could get away with skimming BYU, TCU and Utah from the Mountain West instead of letting any of those schools slip to the Pac-10. The three teams leaving the Big 12 would hurt the conference's prestige from a football standpoint, but BYU and TCU would cushion that blow.
PAC-10
Current members to remain: Arizona, Arizona State, California, Oregon, Oregon State, Stanford, UCLA, USC, Washington, Washington State
Would-be additions: Boise State, Colorado, Fresno State,

Nevada, San Diego State, UNLV
Would-be subtractions: None
Bottom line: The shift here would add six of the best teams from the Western Athletic Conference (Boise State, Fresno State, Nevada), Mountain West Conference (San Diego State, UNLV) and Big 12 bottom-feeder Colorado. It wouldn't make the Pac-10 much stronger in football outside of Boise State, though it would give teams like Washington State a chance to get off the conference floor in football.
One would think that the Pac-10 would be pushing hard to absorb Utah, BYU and TCU, who are the powerhouses of the Mountain West, but in this hypothetical realignment, those three head to the Big 12, which makes sense geographically. This shift would make the Pac-10 a 16-team conference that would stretch as far east as Boulder, Colorado (Colorado), northwest as Seattle, Washington (Washington) and as far south as San Diego, California (SDSU). Adding Utah instead of Colorado would make more sense geographically, especially since the Pac-10 would be expanding to include two MWC teams anyway.
Verdict: It's kind of a funky move for the Pac-10. There's a certain big-school feel to the current set-up, and adding five mid-majors and a cellar dweller in Colorado wouldn't go a long way. One would think the Pac-10 wouldn't be thrilled about adding these six, outside of the boost that would go along with adding Boise State in football.
SECCurrent members to remain: Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, LSU, Mississippi, Mississippi State, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt
Would-be additions: Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Miami (FL)

Would-be subtractions: None
Bottom line: The football-centric SEC would love nothing more than to scoop up the other best teams in the southeastern region of the United States. Stealing Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech and Miami would not only make sense geographically, but it would also be a huge coup for the conference.
The SEC would still stretch from Florida up to Lexington, Kentucky (Kentucky) and as far west as Fayetteville, Arkansas (Arkansas), adding two schools from Florida, one from Georgia and one from South Carolina, where other SEC teams already reside.
From a basketball standpoint, the SEC certainly wouldn't get any stronger, and Kentucky would still be atop the standings almost yearly.
Verdict: A nice upgrade from a football standpoint, considering that's the conference's mission objective. Miami and Florida State bring a stellar football tradition, and Clemson and Georgia Tech would fill in nicely in the middle of the pack each year with the likes of Ole Miss and South Carolina.